In which she just might tear out her hair
Apr. 12th, 2010 06:32 pmO hai thar Internets, I need vital informations! Imagine a pictorial stained glass window for a church, about 1x2 metres. How long would it, in Denmark in the 16th century, have taken to do each of:
a) source coloured glass (or might one have it lying around)?
b) cut said glass into appropriately shaped bitties?
c) join the bitties together and have a glorious window?
I'm grasping at straws in my chronology and if I get inconvenient answers I'll have to rewrite this scene again from scratch.
I mean, I already have to write it again from scratch, because the conversations started in the wrong order, but I'll have to write it again from scratch without a stained glass window, and that stained glass window was going to merge a couple of plot strands, a couple of theme strands, and a whole heap of OMG PRETTY.
Just so you know why I'm going to be bald in a day or two when my artist friend comes back from her glass class with informations for me.
Update #1: Thanks all, I'm growing increasingly resigned to Plan A being the stuff of deals with the devil and, on the upside, increasingly optimistic about my new shiny Plan C potentially working. (Plan B was unsatisfactory.)
Update #2: (written at the same time as update #1) Semi-related revelations force me to admit that I now need to rewrite part of the penultimate scene. "One step forward, two steps back" strikes again!
a) source coloured glass (or might one have it lying around)?
b) cut said glass into appropriately shaped bitties?
c) join the bitties together and have a glorious window?
I'm grasping at straws in my chronology and if I get inconvenient answers I'll have to rewrite this scene again from scratch.
I mean, I already have to write it again from scratch, because the conversations started in the wrong order, but I'll have to write it again from scratch without a stained glass window, and that stained glass window was going to merge a couple of plot strands, a couple of theme strands, and a whole heap of OMG PRETTY.
Just so you know why I'm going to be bald in a day or two when my artist friend comes back from her glass class with informations for me.
Update #1: Thanks all, I'm growing increasingly resigned to Plan A being the stuff of deals with the devil and, on the upside, increasingly optimistic about my new shiny Plan C potentially working. (Plan B was unsatisfactory.)
Update #2: (written at the same time as update #1) Semi-related revelations force me to admit that I now need to rewrite part of the penultimate scene. "One step forward, two steps back" strikes again!
no subject
Date: 2010-04-12 10:50 am (UTC)I'm frankly a little unnerved. Unnerved and delighted! Thank you once again, Dreamwidth!
As for your book, I will have to echo the previous commenter and say "Wow ... just wow." I'm pretty sure I DO know a window with a Last Supper under a Crucifixion, but not with the wonderful lining up of the chalice and all that symbolism. Because surely I would have noticed that. SURELY?! It is about two hours drive away but now I have a yearning for a road-trip (Reality is bound to hit and I can find a parishioner to tell me!)
As to if they would let him try this, I don't think it is so far beyond the pale. I guess it depends somewhat on if he is a "master craftsman" (ie must he answer to anyone on the making side of things) and his relationship with the bishop or whatever ecclesiastical authority has commissioned/authorised the window. But surely they would go "WOW, yeah!" too! :-)
And this is a sequel you say? *trots off to figure out how to get paws on first book*
no subject
Date: 2010-04-12 03:05 pm (UTC)Er, ask zeborah and she'll send you the MS for beta-reading?
no subject
Date: 2010-04-12 07:50 pm (UTC)Oh yeah. <makes mental note to add into the scene the parish priest - what's-his-name, I've got his name somewhere, anyway that guy - and the Bishop of Roskilde too, he'd probably still be hanging around town>
I should, um, really get back to submitting that book to publishers and agents. I did to a couple but they didn't want it, and then life's kept me busy enough it's been enough trouble just writing; and between writing and submitting, it's the writing that keeps me sane, so... :-)
But in the meantime I'd be happy to email you the manuscript - just on condition that you tell me anything confusing/boring/annoying about it, and/or any way I could tweak it to make it better. :-)
no subject
Date: 2010-04-13 04:32 am (UTC)http://www.stjamesanglicanchurchmorpeth.com.au/files/3093240/uploaded/Window.jpg
I can't begin to imagine the hassle it would be persuading people to publish a book. Let alone that heart and soul have been poured into it, so rejection is not so easy to shrug off. But I would love to read it :-)
no subject
Date: 2010-04-13 10:56 pm (UTC)I'm actually okay with rejection. Though it's easier with short stories, where I know there's dozens of potential markets and have got a semi-routine about submit-get rejection-resubmit, than with novels where... it's mostly that I'm not as familiar and practised with what markets there are, so I have to think more, so procrastination sets in.
Anyway, I shall send it to you. Just let me know what email address to use? (I'm at zeborah (at) gmail.com)