![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
zeborahOkay, try this one:
If you're still not happy with it, it would be of great help to me if you could note precisely what you disagree with and/or offer alternative wordings.
But please note that I consider it very important to explicitly include:
a) the groups that have been implicitly sidelined by the sf community in general and rasfc in particular; and
b) the topics which were theoretically allowed on rasfc but which in practise more than one of us was afraid to talk about.
1) We will focus on discussing the process of writing speculative fiction (science-fiction, fantasy, and related genres).
2 a) We know that writers write in various genres, at various lengths, on various topics, in various orders, with various technologies, varyingly planned or unplanned, etc, according to their personal style and needs.
b) We want to share what works for us, and we want other writers to feel free and safe to share what works for them.
c) Therefore we will avoid implying either that any particular technique is obligatory, or that any particular technique is wrong - though there might be times when a particular technique is wrong for a particular author or for a particular story.
3 a) We know that society in general and speculative-fiction in specific contain many stereotypes and biases that are racist, sexist, homophobic, ablist, and/or intolerant of people in non-nuclear family structures, people of different religions or of no religion, and others.
b) We don't want to unwittingly perpetuate such stereotypes and biases in our own fiction. We also don't want to unwittingly perpetuate them in real life and/or hurt a fellow human being.
c) Therefore we want other members to feel free and safe to point out to us if we've said something that accidentally perpetuates stereotypes or biases or is otherwise hurtful; and we will take it as a favour and learn from it if they do.
4) Therefore, on-topic discussions will include but not be limited to:
a) dragon biology, alien speech patterns, how horses differ from motorcycles, ways to show/confuse chronology in time travel stories, etc;
b) outlines, punctuation, use of themes, infodumps, RSI, pen porn, etc;
c) cultural appropriation, sexist language, homophobic tropes, depictions of religion, etc; and
d) pun cascades, cats and chocolate, etc; because frivolity is the mortar that binds together a community.
5) The group will be moderated by a panel in order to keep it friendly and safe for all members.
If you're still not happy with it, it would be of great help to me if you could note precisely what you disagree with and/or offer alternative wordings.
But please note that I consider it very important to explicitly include:
a) the groups that have been implicitly sidelined by the sf community in general and rasfc in particular; and
b) the topics which were theoretically allowed on rasfc but which in practise more than one of us was afraid to talk about.
Re: warning contains racefail related ranting.
Date: 2009-05-04 07:59 pm (UTC)One aspect of white privilege specifically is the privilege to think "it's all in the past". I've been there - I used to think "Well, *now* we've got a level playing field so why can't we all just get along?" But we don't. Things were stolen from the ancestors of Mäori and made available cheaply to the ancestors of my family, and the respective disadvantages and advantages have been inherited by those of us living today. I recently read a book set in 19th century China and it didn't come out and say it but it was obvious from reading it that things were stolen from China as a country and made available cheaply to the citizens of various Western countries, including the UK. The respective devastation and prosperity has its effects to this day and minute.
Every time we save money by buying "Made in China" we benefit from colonialism.
This doesn't mean I have to go around apologising to every Mäori or Chinese person I meet. For one thing, that'd get really awkward for them. (Imagine if every man I met had to start off by apologising to me. Ugh.) It doesn't mean I have to feel guilty; what good would that do anyone? It doesn't even mean I should stop buying "Made in China", because economics is More Complicated Than That.
But it does mean that I want to be aware of that history and of its effects on the present so that I don't unwittingly say or do something which will make the present worse. Being colourblind doesn't help because there are things that, if I say them to a white person they won't even notice, but if I say them to a Mäori of Chinese person it would be very hurtful.
This isn't a political campaign; but it's a group where I don't want to make things worse or hurtful for people. That means that if I see someone saying something that will make the group uncomfortable for people of colour -- and what you said about RaceFail in particular would have done that -- then I will say something about it. Just like I said something about "twat".
Wanting to avoid hurting people is not political.
[I'm freezing replies to Helen's comment to avoid any potential <flail>. If Helen wants to reply to this one then we can continue the conversation. Otherwise if anyone else wants to reply to anything related to this subthread, maybe post it on your own LJ and post a link to it here in reply to me?]
(frozen) Re: warning contains racefail related ranting.
Date: 2009-05-04 11:03 pm (UTC)'Wanting to avoid hurting people is not political'
but deciding whose hurt counts is. I am horrified by the way you have disregarded Helen's experience.
I'm out of here.
Re: warning contains racefail related ranting.
Date: 2009-05-05 01:56 am (UTC)After that I returned to the topic under discussion, which was race.
I know on a project like this I can't please everyone. No community can. If you're not happy with the group I want to build, then I'm glad you do continue to be happy with rasfc.
Re: warning contains racefail related ranting.
Date: 2009-05-08 01:43 am (UTC)And now I'm starting to feel self-centrededly better-than-thou so I think I should stop. But I did want to let you know (and I think you can handle knowing) and as I said, I think here replying to you rather than Nicky is the responsible thing for me to do.
Re: warning contains racefail related ranting.
Date: 2009-05-08 06:35 am (UTC)I expected some reactions from some people. I think there was more than I expected, which isn't pleasant but is manageable (it would have been a helluva lot worse on rasfc) and is something I need to learn to cope with. It's quite a luxury to be able to start that learning in a by-and-large friendly environment where, should it all go to pot, I have complete control over comments. :-)
Re: warning contains racefail related ranting.
Date: 2009-05-05 04:55 am (UTC)Found the title and author: "The last empress" by Anchee Min.