<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>

<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>Zeborah</title>
  <link>http://zeborah.dreamwidth.org/</link>
  <description>Zeborah - Dreamwidth Studios</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:58:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / Dreamwidth Studios</generator>
  <lj:journal>zeborah</lj:journal>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  <atom10:link rel='self' href='http://zeborah.dreamwidth.org/data/rss' />
  <atom10:link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/' />
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://zeborah.dreamwidth.org/110913.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:58:21 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>In which she loves a con (request for recommendations)</title>
  <link>http://zeborah.dreamwidth.org/110913.html</link>
  <description>In the last week and a half, I&apos;ve watched all of White Collar to date.  I entirely blame the totally NSFW fanvid &lt;a href=&quot;http://talitha78.dreamwidth.org/213219.html&quot;&gt;Tonight I&apos;m F**king You&lt;/a&gt; by talitha78.  It&apos;s not the slashy hotness so much as that... the particular dynamics of the slashy hotness suggested to me that we might get some of the character dynamics that I enjoy watching in a show.  So finally I downloaded an episode.  And then I downloaded the rest of the episodes (with a brief hiatus to call my broadband company for more bandwidth).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(I was sick for part of the week. I needed entertainment. The splurge was totally justifiable.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There&apos;s a bunch of things I love about the show (which is kind of like what&apos;d happen if they&apos;d made a spin-off of &quot;Catch Me If You Can&quot;.  FBI guy and ex-con: together they fight crime.)  One is the caperful premise.  Another is FBI guy&apos;s wife (when he has to flirt to preserve his cover, she doesn&apos;t go all soap opera jealous, but bursts out laughing.  And then gives him flirting lessons).  Another is that, although Evil Execs clearly made the show drop the awesome lesbian character (&quot;We&apos;re not the military. We don&apos;t ask, we don&apos;t care.&quot;) after the pilot, the show brought her back by the end of season 1 and kept her, and in season 3 we meet her long-term partner, who&apos;s portrayed just the same as anyone else&apos;s long-term partner.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mostly it&apos;s the character dynamics.  I have a Thing for fictional relationships where the two characters are engaged in devious schemes to outwit each other&apos;s devious schemes to outwit each other, and this picks up in season 3.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The show&apos;s main weakness for me is that it&apos;s all about the straight white men.  (Especially in season 1 and the first half of season 2, where it&apos;s all about Our Hero&apos;s manpainful search for his girlfriend.)  As are a good deal of the other examples of this kind of relationship.  (Javert/Valjean springs to mind. Others would except it&apos;s past my bedtime. When the characters spend more time in the same room than Javert and Valjean did, there may be homoerotic overones.  Or, as in &quot;Catch Me If You Can&quot; there may be paternal overtones.)  It&apos;s not that I dislike watching straight white men attempting to outwit each other, it&apos;s that I&apos;d like some variety.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thinking on it, there are a good number of stories with a male/female pairing in the same basic dynamic (eg Thomas Crowne Affair; Dangerous Liaisons and derivatives; Intolerable Cruelty) and I generally love these too (though Intolerable Cruelty would have been vastly better if the actors had had &lt;em&gt;any chemistry at all&lt;/em&gt;).  These &lt;em&gt;always&lt;/em&gt; have explicit romance involved.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But I started doubting myself, wondering:  would I still enjoy the dynamic if it was two female characters, or am I part of the problem?  It&apos;s really hard to know, because &lt;em&gt;for some strange reason&lt;/em&gt; I couldn&apos;t think of any examples.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finally (thanks to a repeat the other day and a conversation on Twitter tonight) I thought of one which reassured me, because I did love it:  Deokman vs Misil on &lt;em&gt;The Great Queen Seondeok&lt;/em&gt;.  They&apos;re both fantastic characters, both vastly intelligent and ambitious, but Deokman is in it for a vision and Misil is in it for herself.  They lie to, deceive, and manipulate each other without cease.  They hate each other fiercely -- and the best part is they also respect each other.  (A related neat thing is that with the maternal overtones, mostly it&apos;s Misil coded as the mother-figure.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, I&apos;d love more.  Any books, movies, TV shows about two female characters in a spy-vs-spy, or otherwise cerebral adversarial, relationship?  Powerplay, mindgames, and cunning all much appreciated.  Cutting wit is bonus fun.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Or otherwise just any female character being awesome a la the Scarlet Pimpernel, the Saint (minus the Oh Leslie Charteris No fail), etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(Also, completely randomly:  lots of fiction focuses on the father-son relationship.  Some focuses on the mother-daughter relationship.  Sometimes the father-daughter relationship.  But the only mother-son relationships I can think of off-hand involve the son being a serial killer.  What am I forgetting?)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=zeborah&amp;ditemid=110913&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>http://zeborah.dreamwidth.org/110913.html</comments>
  <category>fiction</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>3</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
